I've always found Trump to be a revolting human being. So, despite the fact that we have a majority Republican Congress and most states now have both a GOP governor and legislature, if Trump loses the election is fixed. So, Trump calls on his Trumpies to rebel if Clinton wins. Not if cheating is demonstrated, but if Clinton wins, even if she's ahead in the polls.
If Clinton is elected, it would be a miracle if Trumpies staged anything but the meekest armed rebellion. and the main reason why is actually sad.
Read interviews at any Trump rally. The ages you'll see are 36, 50, 62 and 65. As I pointed out in a prior post, the median age of the white, non-Hispanic population is 42, and white non-Hispanics are somewhere around 99.7% of Trump followers. They have a dearth of young, fit people. Same problem American businesses have, coincidentally. They can’t find enough native citizens to do heavy labor. Maybe Trumpies will have to recruit Hispanics (median age, 26) to rebel for them. That would be ironic.
There are secondary
reasons: logistical problems due to Trump supporters live
mostly scattered in vast rural areas.
Organizing that into an effective insurrection is going to be nearly
impossible. Then again, they can make a lot of trouble in the countryside. Not to the point of toppling the government or even forcing it to negotiate, only to the point of being bigger assholes.
Now, say they create an
insurrection despite those hurdles. They’ll try to rebel without
damaging any private property. Remember how the Oregon Boys at the Malheur Wildlife Refuge pointed
out that they weren’t damaging or burning anybody’s property,
unlike those black protesters? Remember how the Oath Keepers showed up, armed and uninvited to Ferguson, MO, to help protect private property from an insurrection? More than private property, Trumpies
think they’re better than “those people.” Rioting and burning would be a step down on status. For that same reason,
they won’t block highways either.
They could march or
drive down those highways and take over their state capitals,
(without destroying property) but states’
rights are also sacrosanct to them, and they don't see their states as part of the problem, except about eminent domain. Besides, those
legislatures are largely Republican already.
Then they all have
jobs, farms or ranches. They pride themselves on hard work. Remember
they used to tell BLM protesters to “get a job.” For an rebellion, they'd have to abandon their jobs, take a risk of being fired or miss a year's harvest.
So, even if they
find enough people, their values place terrible limit their options. They
could march on Washington, but everybody’s going to know they’re
coming. Once they get there, un-supplied, they’ll face a
professional army.
The only other
things they can do is occupy Federal land in a strategically
negligible location and wait until the feds come and take them out.
I’ll call that the Bundy Plan. Or, they can go the
tantrum/terrorist route. “I want it my way or some random immigrants are going to die.”
Guess what they’ll
likely do? That’s right. I'd call it tantrum terrorism, except people will actually die. Yes, it is what right wing reactionaries have already been doing.
That and harass people at the voting booths. It looks like they'll do just that. They can spot an illegal immigrant on sight, and they can tell how many times an African-American has voted, I guess by the numbers stamped on their foreheads.
That and harass people at the voting booths. It looks like they'll do just that. They can spot an illegal immigrant on sight, and they can tell how many times an African-American has voted, I guess by the numbers stamped on their foreheads.
No comments:
Post a Comment